In a group discussion, which sentence is most clearly challenging the credibility of a source? A. When Gutierrez refers to qubits, she's talking about the field of quantum computing. B. The purpose of Gutierrez's article is to make a point, not to teach a lesson about something technical. C. Gutierrez's article is way too old to say anything relevant about computer science today. D. I disagree with Gutierrez completely that quantum computers will be faster than current computers.
It has nothing to do with the article in and of itself it targets only the source the writer diminishing any info she puts out by saying the writer is old.
